Quote:
Originally Posted by Press Release Pro
He made claims previously that his service would prevent this.
He claim nobody know if the content was removed, when there is public statements available 1+ year ago stating it was removed.
The same statement contain information that the model in question used a fake id.
He as a lawyer state:
1: Nobody know if it was removed
2: His service would have prevented this
Both statements is incorrect and false, it is statements made with the intend to promote his own service.
His statement is a public free legal advise since he appear under his business identity as an attorney, which make him liable as an attorney.
That's the reason for questioning his lawyers insurance
|
One - I never said 2257Safe.com would have prevented what happened. All I said is that 2257Safe.com would allow anyone, including Dirty D, to be able to access his records from anywhere in the world if LE executes a search and seizes their records.
Two - I said no one knows for sure about the content or whether the model in question used a fake ID - except for Dirty D and his IT people. What I did say is that IF it is CP it will come down. Thats the law.
Neither statement is incorrect nor false and neither statement is legal advice.