Quote:
Originally Posted by mgtarheels
What's irrelevant?
You said the Constitution replaced the Articles, but the Articles are part of the Constitution.
Doesn't get much more relevant than that.
|
1. The articles of confederation were replaced. Look up what "replaced" means.
2. You're hilariously throwing around the "misdirection" fallacy to a point I've never seen before. Now listen Junior, it's been fun debating with a minor, but I think that for your self esteem, you should put your daddy back on the computer. One day, a few years from now, you'll absorb enough knowledge to know how to use it in a debate. Then you'll learn how to debate and you might be ready. Until then, this is too pitiful.