Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
So are you saying that with reduced budgets, models faking it more and over production it's a better product today?
|
No, that SMALL percentage of porn DOES suck. But the thousands of independent producers around the world who are shooting amateur girls that are 100% real and not faking it is a lot better product than the stuff put out in the past. Especially since the technology now allows people who don't have a million dollars to do things that million dollar studios couldn't do in the past all from a computer and maybe 10 grand of camera gear.
Just like in music and art...being a big studio doesn't neccessarily mean that you have a superior product. And every year somebody, somewhere will come along and build on the past to make a better product today.
Today we can light up a set far better than they used to with a LOT less heat in the room. We can shoot and edit with one handheld prosumer cam that costs 5 grand and get better quality than guys using a couple of quarter million dollar cams could.
The only thing that made porn of yesterday AND of today suck was when it's shot by a big company that hires a guy to shoot scenes for a dozen different niches. It's impossible to have creativity and real quality like that.
So they hire a guy who can churn out a consistently "good" scene for them. No more, no less. Just like the "old days".