Quote:
Originally Posted by brand0n
mad out the blue you say?
i take this biz very very fucking serious. to even hint that someone as deeply involved as i am in this biz is some how remotely connected to "under age" looking anything isnt just a slap in my face, but also anyone who i am connected too. surely you can understand that. and you can clearly see where what you said could be interpreted in that way.
i think if i were you id just let your last post directed at me be just that, before this gets blown way the fuck out of proportion.
|
congrats on your 27k.
look, the key word of your whole monologue is "could be". Some people are so suspicious they see conspiracy in every word. Why don't you stop to read between the lines, nothing's there.
I can see you keep freaking out even though I told you that it was'nt any kind of accusation or whatever towards you or anybody else, it has nothing to do with you personally.
By referring to under age looks I meant LOOKS, it's when someone LOOKS like someone else. There are dozens and dozens teen paysites where models look barely legal or younger.
They LOOK, but they aren't. Webmasters want their teen models to look younger that they are. And you're blind if you deny that. And these are the looks I was talking about, the looks many webmasters are used to see across the industry, so much that they say "it's no teen" when shown a teen model.
I hope that's clear now and my server's new 10mbps friend stays at mommy's basement.