04-06-2010, 07:44 PM
|
|
|
Beer Money Baron
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies
Unlike you, I am a content producer. I also send out DMCA's every week.
Safe to say I know it a lot better than you.
 |
Obviously not if you think that Google doesn't respond to fake DMCA claims.
The DMCA provisions are pretty clear cut.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_...ack_provisions
Quote:
Takedown example
Here's an example of how the takedown procedures would work:
Alice puts a copy of Bob's song on her AOL-hosted website.
Bob, searching the Internet, finds Alice's copy.
Charlie, Bob's lawyer, sends a letter to AOL's designated agent (registered with the Copyright Office) including:contact information
the name of the song that was copied
the address of the copied song
a statement that he has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
a statement that the information in the notification is accurate
a statement that, under penalty of perjury, Charlie is authorized to act for the copyright holder
his signature AOL takes the song down.
AOL tells Alice that they have taken the song down.
Alice now has the option of sending a counter-notice to AOL, if she feels the song was taken down unfairly. The notice includescontact information
identification of the removed song
a statement under penalty of perjury that Alice has a good faith belief the material was mistakenly taken down
a statement consenting to the jurisdiction of Alice's local US Federal District Court, or, if outside the US, to a US Federal District Court in any jurisdiction in which AOL is found.
her signature If Alice does file a valid counter-notice, AOL notifies Bob, then waits 10-14 business days for a lawsuit to be filed by Bob.
If Bob does not file a lawsuit, then AOL must put the material back up.
|
|
|
|