View Single Post
Old 04-09-2010, 11:25 AM  
VGeorgie
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 359
I think some of you are missing the OP's point.

It's not that MFC does or doesn't have a brilliant model. Or that the model benefits consumers, the girls, and the program itself. Or that there will always be whales willing to pay $100s or $1000s a month on private cam shows.

Rather, it's that MFC is giving away more free explicit content in its free delivery, and is clearly being successful at its business. So, it's only a matter of time before other cam sites do the same, only more, in order to be competitive.

The tubes should have taught us a lesson: this is a business of one-upmanship, to the point of shitting where you eat. Today, MFC may have a great model, but in a year when 20 other cam operators are doing the same, only showing more and more for free, that's the problem. At first tubes seemed like a good idea, too.

It's been pointed out MFC doesn't have an affiliate program, because they don't need to. So imagine more and more free cams, showing increasingly explicit content to get the business, and few of them with an affiliate model.

Where does this leave the affiliate marketer? I guess extolling the virtues of someone else's idea. Certainly not able to make any money off it.
VGeorgie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote