Quote:
Originally Posted by smutnut
Are you asking me, personally?
|
it was posted as an an alternative question to the thread topic, open to all to answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix
id like to respond to dyna mo.
when you make a statement you expect it to ring true...such as
"i've yet to see one single truther/conspiracy theorist say anything along the lines of *well, that makes sense, there's no way they could get enough nano-thermite in that building.*"
to me you assume that you are correct in your assumption that it is indeed hard to get that much nano thermite anywhere.....lets assume you have the means to get nano-thermite, whoever you are....since there are no bomb sniffing dogs at wtc anymore, you can ship it in via ups if you like....even better make your own ups truck and uniforms and just march it right in yourself....even better, the guy delivering the thermite has no idea what he is delivering....ten tons of nano thermite could probably be delivered in 1 day if you wanted to
|
the logistics of getting the material to the site isn't the issue, the issue is the quantity required.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Falcon
What is the official conspiracy version? As far as as I know there isn't one. I have however seen many demolition experts (you know, people who blow things up for a living) say it is impossible for the buildings to have fallen the way they did without dynamite explosions.
|
oh come on now. certainly you know the official conspiracy version is that the u.s. government attacked those buildings in a false flag op in order to justify the attack on iraq.