Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
There's the problem then, you only saw parts of it. I watched it in it's entirety this past week and it did cover in detail who was involved with him, and how. Also covered was the incident where he was interviewed by that female reporter after he had tried to go visit the branch Davidian compound in Wako but was turned away at a roadblock.
The part that either wasn't mentioned or I simply missed it was how he came to choose that particular government building for his target. I'm sure there are hundreds of them strewn all across the US, why this particular one?
|
Yeah I did only watch part, and most of the advertising/PR part of the show was pure bullshit. If they covered the other suspects and especially that #2 John Doe then I guess it's cool.
To contrast the media from back then and today is incredible - there's a ton of mainstream news stuff about doubts on the explosive/s and so on which is never something you'd see in today's coverage of the World Trade Center attacks for example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls
That and the amount of explosives he had could do the damage it did. Even ranking generals in the US army say there is no way he did the damage to the building with just one truck bomb.
|
According to FEMA itself, it would have taken minimum 12,000 pounds of ANFO to do what the government says 2000 did.
Whether it was illegally stored explosives (which is doubtful since the destruction would have been much more ancillary and random) or actually planted bombs, it's obvious there's more to the OK City bombing than the media told us, or the government is willing to admit.
Again.
:D