Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies
That's really the irony in this particular issue.
If Eric banned me, he would also have to ban the vast majority of the people who keep this issue going. All of them are breaking one of two rules and have been for two day now. They have made REAL accusations (not some vague subject header) against me. and/or my business over this week without posting any proof. Others have made between a half dozen of these threads with excessive harassment, and inciting others. Also against the rules.
So in reality, you can't have it both ways. ALL would have to be banned.
|
Barefootsies, I have never had anything against you and often you have made interesting contributions to biz threads. If you notice this is the first time I comment on you. However, what is irritating is the recent spamming campaign with either hosting deals, "So fucking banned" pics, "guy pointing to sig", huge arrows pointing to your sig etc.
I don't buy your argument that people should just use the Ignore button. If that was the case then the Banhammer/moderating shouldn't exist in the first place.
You have gotten a few of your opponents banned on technicalities (breaking GFY rules). It means you accept and play by the rules of the game. Now, when you have broken one of the same rules (not posting proof) in a fair world you should also be banned then.
Barefootsies, why is the moderator giving you special privileges which the rest of the rule-abiding posters don't have? Are you personal friends or something like that? Can you elaborate on this? Is this some hidden unspoken "Bro-thing" or?
I have no idea idea. It just strikes my sense of justice to see you go unpunished when others have been banned for the same offense.
Maybe Eric can explain why Barefootsies deserves special treatment over others?