gideongallery

first of all fair use supercede copyright violations specifically because of the notwithstanding clause and the explict declaration that fair use is not a copyright violation

which means your statement is totally wrong

if you ment to say that pink visual has proof that it is not fair use and therefore it is a direct copyright violation (which it seems to be based on your next statement ) then that a different issue


based on their public statement they are going after brazzers for providing a service that facilitates the fair use of commentary for people who BOUGHT pink visual content.

so either they ARE trying to stomp all over the fair use of commentary with a bitch move lawsuit

or

they are trying to destroy fair use of commentary by spread fud with a bogus claim in the press and winning it with a real arguement (like undeniable proof that brazzers employees uploaded the content with express written consent from all the board of directors of brazzers)

either way my comment still stands

i hope they get their ass handed to them

if they had the undeniable proof of knowing and authorized infringement they should be publicly sticking to those facts not trying to FUD against the fair use right of commentary.

__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak