Quote:
Originally Posted by Allison
|
so my beef with your case is that you are either
- attacking the fair use of commentary directly (based on the statement made)
- hiding the real arguement and making anti fair use attacks publically to create the false impression that you superceded the context of commentary
you responded by saying
Quote:
|
Maybe you should actually read the lawsuit & the documents & judgments already disclosed versus basing your opinions off of a sentence of an Xbiz article. Our confidence in this case remains.
|
and you give me a link to non public documents that would require pay my lawyer to see.
There is no way looking at the documents would change the beef
because either
- your case is accurately defined publically in the NON PUBLIC DOCUMENTS (beef 1)
- your case has hidden proof not publically disclosed that will be the real justification for the win which means the public statement was anti-fair use FUD (beef 2)
i will ask again please provide me links to the "already disclosed" documents and judgements not the entire non public documentation.