Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
The upload link doesn't allow you to upload... let me rephrase that, users/visitors/surfers can't upload to them.
So unless the magic Internet fairy is doing it......
|
well it looked like it worked i will do a test upload to confirm
Quote:
Proof? That one username that does all the uploads sure does have a lot of memberships... I don't remember the URL but someone broke it all down once for us... other than that, proof will come out in discoveries.
You haven't read any documentation on this... at all, you have read the two news reports posted on xbiz.
How do I post proof? One it's not my Content, two... do they send back an email that say sorry, we aren't responding?
Proof is in the Court case...
No, it means you only have the balls to spew crap that you know is bullshit because you know it makes no difference in the end. Even when you're wrong.
If you were standing in front of peoples faces, you wouldn't say this shit - because you know it's crap.
|
this started because you stated when i complained
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Actually they have direct copyright violations... which does violate fair use.
Don't try to argue over something that all the information you have is from news reports on a forum. I will make you look rather stupid.
|
it clearly implies that i am missing some PUBLIC information that you had that i missed that would change the oppinion i would have on the case.
yet you can't present any proof.
so what you ment to say (assuming you weren't deliberately trying to mislead) was
Quote:
Actually CLAIM they have PROOF of direct copyright violations ... which does not violate fair use
and i believe them even though i have seen no proof
|
if your right then their current PUBLIC statements are FUD in attempt to misrepresent their win for other reasons as a win that invalidates the concept of "check out my favorite model name clip" as commentary.
which as you know is one of my beefs with their public statements about the case.