Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
I am disappointed in your trying to manipulate me into thinking that your approval of whatever intelligence i have is going to lead me to saying something i'd rather not.
frankly, you're never going to find a document saying 'we're going set up this law to be as insulting and racial as possible'
doesn't mean the reality doesn't exist.
what else exists is quite simply how long it will take till you yourself will be presenting identification to prove you're not illegal
|
Right now, when I am pulled over by a cop for speeding, I must provide ID. If I were loitering at the darkened back door of a shop late at night and a cop stops me, I must also provide ID. This is called "in the course of lawful contact" and it is one of the center points of the law.
So you are going to argue based on a law that you haven't even READ???
This reminds me of the US congressmen and senators that vote for or against a healthcare or bailout bill that they haven't read either.
How does that make sense? Doesn't it seem a bit intellectually lazy?
Do you often tell people that books are crap that you haven't read? Or movies are crap that you haven't watched?
Just wondering...
.
.