Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong
I think the psychology of people who constantly attack "conspiracy theorists" to be much more interesting.
For the most part, it NEVER involves debating the evidence, and usually just involves name calling or some medical psychological problem (as you listed). This is just as bad as calling someone a kook or nutjob (fox news tactics).
I've been called every name in the book on here.
It comes down to fear. I have friends and relatives that don't want to research things (especially 9/11) cause they wouldn't be able to handle it if the actual "conspiracy theory" was true. So its easier and safer to discredit the character of people.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Mark Twain
|
this isn't entirely accurate, especially from my perspective. i've asked more than one 9/11 truther around here to discuss how much nano-thermite it would take to bring down the towers and the reply is ALWAYS a deflection. every single time.
hell, i'll try it again, simply because i would LOVE to debate this.
how much nano-thermite would it take to bring down the towers and bldg 7?