Quote:
Originally Posted by ReGGs
|
Did you read the article? I think it actually goes to "the exception proves the rule"
"Mullah Tahir ul Qadri recently issued a 600 page fatwa (edict) condemning violence in the name of Islam for any reason. For this act, Muslim and non-Muslim media alike are hailing him as a revolutionary. Alas, nothing could be further from the truth. This praise for Mullah ul Qadri is misplaced and unjustified for several reasons.
First, for nearly a decade now some so called Muslims have actively engaged in suicide bombings and other atrocities. Why did it take Mullah ul Qadri a full decade to realize that perhaps violence in the name of Islam is wrong? Imagine the lives that could have been saved if he expressed this feature of Islam in 2000, instead of 2010.
Second, historically, Mullah ul Qadri has actively persecuted and spoken out against religious minorities, particularly Muslim minorities. How can a man who has no tolerance for a different religious point of be trusted to stop violence against them? Pakistan's blasphemy laws were enacted in his time and with his knowledge and support, and as a result, thousands of religious minorities have been beaten up, harassed, and even murdered. Mullah ul Qadri has not offered even a single statement of concern or rebuke.
Third, Mullah ul Qadri believes the punishment for apostasy in Islam is death. Aside from the fact that this is not true, Mullah ul Qadri insists that a peaceful Islam can co-exist with an Islam that kills those who choose to accept a different faith. He is a prime example of a walking contradiction.
The last and most crucial point is that Imam Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of India declared over 100 years ago that violence has no place in Islam. Muslims who follow Mirza Ghulam Ahmad provide a 100 plus year history of absolute non-violence. Not a single example can be found to the contrary. Mullah ul Qadri considers Imam Ahmad a heretic for this peaceful interpretation of Jihad. Now, it seems that Mullah ul Qadri has boarded the wagon. How unfortunate that he does not give credit where it is due."