Let's do some math & statistics. My affiliate ID is 2148, it's 2010, so actually there's maybe 2500 moniker affiliates. Let's just suppose that there are on average 13 badly credited moniker accounts for each affiliate member.
(2500 affiliates ) * (13 badly credit accounts)=32500 badly credited accounts - for years. Do you believe that?
So once again, another company under Oversee this shaved me 2100$ + some sales I've got 0$ commission - that's 2800$ shave for less then 2 weeks.
But to be fair, let's be naive and take that everything as an accident. The main rule of business is (italian "cu sgarra paga") - Who fails he pays.
Snapnames & Moniker are constantly failing and everytime, member who makes effort pay for their problems.
And I really don't believe anything of mentioned above was accident. As Snapnames did admit in 2009 that they don't count commissions by their own rules. Essociate.com (company to take heat from Snapnames) admit in official e-mail that they don't count commissions by their own rules.
So I've described Snapnames & Moniker business model.
And now, let's get back to Nelson Brady aka Halvarez. Was he shill bidding himself without anyone knowing it?
European law system makes decisions really slow. Anglo saxon law system (the common law) makes decisions more on "influnce on commission".
The best law system was probably way back in Rome. Roman lawyers thousands years ago made pure law & justice model (OK there were slaves, there were emperoros those were different times).
When Roman laywer was seeking for truth he asked only one question: Cui bono - To whose benefit?
Now ask yourself, to whose benefit was Brady's shill bidding - you got it. It was Snapnames. Snapnames is same company that refuse to fully cover damage caused.
And just one imaginary variant: Let's apply Brady's model on Moniker brokerage. Are you sure nobody abuse discrete information to rise price high. Higher price, higher commission for company that has information both from seller and buyer. This is just imaginary. Might be possible.
I've told you my story and support it with enough evidence. I believe there are smart guys in webmaster & domainer industry so I don't make any conclusion at the end.
I let you decide.
No matter if you were buying domains through Snapnames or you used Moniker brokerage. Or you're Snapnames or Moniker affiliate. Who knows what Domainsponsor does?
Think about it for a second. And maybe you'll find out what's going on and get serious suspicion that you've lost huge amount of money.
And if you believe so and possible damage is significant, just contact your lawyer, and make Attornet general find out and judge and commission to decide.
HOT NEWS: I gained e-mail contact for Lawrence Ng - founder of Oversee.
I've e-mailed him about this case explaining everything and supporting him with evidence.
And guess what happened. I was ignored.
There are two options:
a) Shaving is company business model
b) Lawerence know but turns blind eye while $ is comming. Who cares about customers.
Also I want to make another point, financial damage + bad intention (you judge if above mentioned is bad intention)=criminal.
Do we like to support criminals (you judge). I bet you don't. We are honest internet businessmen. Those who runs their business and try to focus just on it. Or are you willing to doeblecheck every income and every expense to be sure?
Say HELL NO to Monte Cahn, Lawrence Ng, SnapNames, Moniker, DomainSponsor and Oversee.net
If you think your friends or your blog readers are in danger of rip-off, tell them, write article. Make pressure on Lawrence to kick out every scumbag from company. We need reliable Moniker, we need SnapNames without shill-bidding, we need DomainsSponsor to be under respected company.
Videos of Moniker manual account reset ordered by Monte Cahn or should I rather say Cohn.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=b_eWbxuruZ4
https://youtube.com/watch?v=pggc3R57apg
Original article:
http://www.webmasterinter.net/2010/0...see-you-judge/