Quote:
Originally Posted by MDCQ
There is no litigation. IMHO, it's just a made up excuse to not comment on the security breach. That whole break-in story is covered in so much bullshit, i don't know how people still do business with TMM. John is obviously one insecure, batshit crazy motherfucker.
|
That's not true - there was quite a lot of litigation going on between TMM and someone (forget the name, would have to checkmy bookmarks) who tried to hide behind some defense of journalist right to privacy or whatever it is, but she went on spouting off tidbits picked up here and there from forums to make a blog about how bad TMM were. It was pathetic and TMM were right to sue for libel. They won, she appealed, they won the appeal. I don't think any damages were awarded though, but they were 100% right to go against that person as what they were saying was wrong and based on here say and was damaging to the TMM business.
Don't join the masses that are spoon fed a few tidbits and who makes up their own mind and spouts off behind the "security" of a computer screen against a business. That is just dumb.
The facts as stated are not in doubt. What litigation at the moment prevents, is knowing what the outcome of the criminal investigation into the initial hack comes/came to. I'm pretty sure (hope) law enforcement agencies or private investigators were involved to find out who hacked their database and after all the dust settles in a few months or year, we'll find out the details of what happened. THere were too many peole involved to not disclose stuff - whether publicly or privately - to those that were involved.
So shut your trap on your by-standing yelling and calm the flames.