Quote:
Originally Posted by v4 media
Thx for the explanation.. So why are they named in the suit should be the banks nope?
|
My only guess would be general ignorance about how billing actually works. I wouldn't have known if we didn't have NATS and use cascading billing including our own merchant account with netbilling as the gateway. It's not really something that most people would have knowledge of or care to I suppose.
I'm guessing they just kept clicking on the "join" page and looked at each "biller" One of them shows up as "Netbilling" so they included them.
Pretty typical when attorneys that don't know how a business works try to figure it out. After all it would look like Netbilling is some kind of company like CC Bill at first glance to the "civilian" eye.