Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfrisky
Ah ok, then i guess i can return those fools the same favor then?
I thought eric was going to pursue the rules a bit tighter.. guess not.
|
EH? If that was the case then surely you would have been banned yourself. Your "employee" posted some very dubious pictures of very young looking girls with your watermark across them. That would get most people banned on most boards. You've yet to explain why he did this, all you say all the time is "post proof". what proof do you need? enough people saw the pics for the thread to cover two pages. Will you at least answer the question that has been asked enough times, why were pictures of very young looking women posted in an attempt to promote your programme and if those girls were of legal age then you surely MUST have rights to use those pics including proof that those girls were indeed over 18?