View Single Post
Old 05-29-2010, 04:35 PM  
pornlaw
Confirmed User
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,856
Here's a good read why shooting outside of California & New Hampshire may not be the best bet for content producers....

http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/...den%5B1%5D.pdf

Contracts for sex are illegal and cannot be enforced. A model release is a contract....

And this is why producing in Florida might not be a good idea....

Florida has a statute that gives a prostitute the right to sue a pimp/agent or even production company for profits. The exploitation of pornography is defined as coercion which will trip a civil lawsuit. Prostitution is defined as the giving or receiving of the body for sexual activity for hire but excludes sexual activity between spouses. And attorneys fees can be awarded if a model or prostitute is successful in the litigation. This is a very nasty statute for porn producers in Florida.

Quote:
796.09 Coercion; civil cause of action; evidence; defenses; attorney's fees.--

(1) A person has a cause of action for compensatory and punitive damages against:

(a) A person who coerced that person into prostitution;

(b) A person who coerces that person to remain in prostitution; or

(c) A person who uses coercion to collect or receive any part of that person's earnings derived from prostitution.

(2) As used in this section, the term "prostitution" has the same meaning as in s. 796.07.

(3) As used in this section, the term "coercion" means any practice of domination, restraint, or inducement for the purpose of or with the reasonably foreseeable effect of causing another person to engage in or remain in prostitution or to relinquish earnings derived from prostitution, and includes, but is not limited to:

(a) Physical force or threats of physical force.

(b) Physical or mental torture.

(c) Kidnapping.

(d) Blackmail.

(e) Extortion or claims of indebtedness.

(f) Threat of legal complaint or report of delinquency.

(g) Threat to interfere with parental rights or responsibilities, whether by judicial or administrative action or otherwise.

(h) Promise of legal benefit.

(i) Promise of greater financial rewards.

(j) Promise of marriage.

(k) Restraint of speech or communication with others.

(l) Exploitation of a condition of developmental disability, cognitive limitation, affective disorder, or substance dependency.

(m) Exploitation of victimization by sexual abuse.

(n) Exploitation of pornographic performance.

(o) Exploitation of human needs for food, shelter, safety, or affection.

(4) In the course of litigation under this section, any transaction about which a plaintiff testifies or produces evidence does not subject such plaintiff to criminal prosecution or any penalty or forfeiture. Further, any testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, or information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or evidence which is given or produced by a plaintiff or a witness for a plaintiff shall not be used against these persons in any other investigation or proceeding. Such testimony or evidence, however, may be used against a plaintiff or a witness for a plaintiff upon any criminal investigation or proceeding for perjury committed while giving such testimony or producing such evidence.

(5) It does not constitute a defense to a complaint under this section that:

(a) The plaintiff was paid or otherwise compensated for acts of prostitution;

(b) The plaintiff engaged in acts of prostitution prior to any involvement with the defendant; or

(c) The plaintiff made no attempt to escape, flee, or otherwise terminate contact with the defendant.

(6) Evidence of convictions for prostitution or prostitution-related offenses are inadmissible in a proceeding brought under this section for purposes of attacking the plaintiff's credibility.

(7) In any action brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award prevailing plaintiffs reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
I would be very careful where and how you shoot content. You guys may not like California and no longer think it is the center of the porn universe, but its still 100% protected and legal here. If they can take down the industry here, it would be a cake walk to take it down in any other state in the US. Especially in a state like Florida where other than Miami, the industry gets prosecuted regularly.
__________________
Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote