Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrah
Even when no malice was behind it? I've read up on it and there has to be malice behind it or if you knew it wasn't true but still ran it. Whatever I say I believe is 100% true.
|
See, this right here is the basis of everybody's problem with you.
You've "read up on it" and you ACTUALLY believe that the standard for libel is what YOU BELIEVE to be true. You honestly think there's a glaring loop hole in the law the allows you to print libelous information simply because you believe it's true? Do you have any idea how juvenile that sounds?
Honestly, your track record with solid research hasn't been very good. You're clearly an outsider hoping to push your way so you can represent the poor women working in porn. The glaring error in your reasoning is that you don't have anybody for a client. In plain English, YOU DON'T REPRESENT ANYONE. The only information you have is second hand in the best cases and pure conjecture in the worst. You're not a journalist and you're in way over your head. Stop before you do yourself some real harm.