Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
hmm i see nats sites in sig , bad sign. NATS seemed to want nothing to do with finding/exposing/criminally charging the culprits last time. Kind of an open invitation for hackers to try the same hack, especially when they know their target isn't interested in finding them, charging them or exposing holes.
|
exactly, and all nats did was sue the whistle blower for stating information about the matter. the IP that was hacking all of the servers was in California at a hosting company, would not have been hard to get server logs.... but sueing "reporters" in washington was more important. or.... who knows.