Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
it not dead stop vs full speed ahead problem
it like if you turned the parking break on in a car, you could still gun the engine and go forward.
you would just move very very slowly
your trying to argue that just because you can move forward the parking break being on doesn't have any effect whatsoever
That bull shit. and you know it.
|
If I want to put the parking break on my car and drive is slowly down the road that should be up to me to do. You are free to do with your car as you wish. I'm not stopping you. I'm not telling you what to do, I just want the right to do what I feel is best for me and not be forced to do things I might not want to do.
Quote:
your mixing property rights with copyright
if you want property rights then so do i
i have no problem with that
buying a video from you would be the same as buying a car
i could build a business renting out that property (avis)
i could tear it apart and sell the pieces (body shops)
if i wanted to tear it apart, duplicate all the parts put it back together and produce a new version (reverse engineering/ competitive intelligence) and build and sell my own version of your video.
and you would have no right to stop me
if that what you want great let get rid of copyright al together have the content covered by standard property right laws
if you sell me a car you don't have a right to tell me what i can do with that car after i bought you got paid
if i want to rent it out i can
if i want to ship it to a foreign country i can
if i want to give it away i can
if you want your movie to be treated like a commodity that actually an arguement to get rid of copyright.
the problem it your trying to argue you should have property right for control copyright give you.
a control that was explictly given to you under the condition you respect my fair use rights.
you want the benefit without meeting your responsiblity of the agreement
why the fuck do you believe that is fair.
btw it not me but the independent court that would have to determine if it fair use or not.
just because you would not win that arguement since you are basically making claims that if applied to established fair uses would have made them illegal too (see your they are not rioting in the streets so it must be ok arguement above)
|
I never said anything about selling you a car and telling you what you could do with it. If I sell you a car I don't care if you fuck it in the muffler. But my car is mine and I should be allowed to dictate how it is used.
Fair use, as you see it, means that if I decide not to release my movie in every possible format in every possible market then you should be allowed to download it and view it without paying since I didn't provide you with a way to conveniently view it. I disagree with that. I think fair use does as it says and it allows some people to use small parts of it for news, study, parody etc, but it doesn't mean that I should be forced to provide everyone with a my product when they want it in whatever format they want it or risk losing money to them just taking it.