View Single Post
Old 05-13-2003, 04:07 PM  
nevermind
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally posted by tony404
A jury would be quicker to go in favor of MC which is in their pocket, then the processing company that helps pornographers. They already said in the press they are protecting the consumer, unfortunately the jury will be made of consumers.
That's a good point. Most of the women probably won't be sympathetic since it's a porn company. And the men will probably want to preserve their power to dispute charges.

I wonder if Epoch can actually sue Mastercard anyway. The lawsuit repeatedly states that Paycom's merchant account is actually with their "Acquiring Bank," not directly with Mastercard.

Granted, Mastercard is calling the shots through the Acquiring Bank --- but I wonder if, from a legal standpoint, the bank should be sued rather than Mastercard?

Last edited by nevermind; 05-13-2003 at 04:09 PM..
nevermind is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote