Quote:
Originally posted by cash69
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by tony404
A jury would be quicker to go in favor of MC which is in their pocket, then the processing company that helps pornographers. They already said in the press they are protecting the consumer, unfortunately the jury will be made of consumers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should that even be relevant? Why should the jury know this? The jury should not be told what they process.. so they can look straight at the facts.
|
Well unless they live in a cave they will know, I quote the NY Times article :
"Most of Paycom's billing clients are sex-related Web sites,
which industry experts say are more prone to fraud and
"chargebacks," the term for purchases that customers deny
making."