Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
do you not understand the concept of censorship.
that arguement would be cross the censorship line as much as demanding government level ban on all porn, or .xxx mandated domain structure that could be blocked on country or isp level bases.
i support her right to speak, because she is not advocating censorship in
any form
|
No, you do not understand the concept. You are NOT entitled to a "freedom" you were never given. Removing child abuse and copyright infringements is not censorship. It's things that shouldn't be there in the first place (i.e. the concept of consent).
Removing things that were given consent too, i.e. performers of legal age and producers freedom to market their websites (within their control), is censorship. Shape or form doesn't matter, it is censorship if someone tell anyone of legal age that they can't do and show certain things (anal sex, gangbang, whatever...).
Yes, she is entitled to an opinion, but she IS advocating censorship if she tells us what kind of sex we can perform, show and market to and from adults.
The only positive thing about .xxx, assuming it became mandatory worldwide, is that every domain without consent/license would be shut down. Simple as that. However, if copyright was respected, the producers would have more control and .xxx wouldn't be necessary. A label would be enough.
You guys advocating copyright infringing websites/p2p just don't get it. You think YOU are advocating freedoms and at the same time you blame the producers? The producers (artists, musicians, writers etc.) NEVER gave you the freedom to expose offending material to children, and that's what you do when you put violence and bukakke movies out where there are young audience. YOU destroy freedoms and you are NOT part of this industry.
We can reduce exposure to children significally by removing all websites and servers from internet that do not have the license to show explicite material. The legal sites can then label their sites, so parents and administrators can choose to filter. That is not censorship, but it become censorship if we are told what we can or can't perform.
