Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
Another misleading title by Gideongallery.
A fine is not unconstitional but the amount was. He, a student (26 years old = not kid), still have to pay $67,500, $2,250 per infringed work + he will carry a criminal record because the amount exceeds 1k, for downloading mp3s and have it in his shared folder.
Yeah, he must be very happy and *not* regret he bought the 4 albums for 10 bucks each instead...
So what are you implying and cheering Gideongallery? That it's legal to download and share copyrighted work?
lol @ timeshifting
This student was even warned several times but he ignored it. So he is also punished for his own stupidity, beside his crime. Don't become that guy.
|
my god how totally clueless are you
do you even read what i say before you respond
might be a good idea since it would prevent you from totally misrepresenting what i said.
i have made it bigger for you to see
BTW the title is directly from torrent freak no changes this time so don't attribute it to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
http://torrentfreak.com/judge-slams-...tional-100709/
this is the kid who is actually guilty and admitted it
and this follows the reduction against Jammie Thomas
http://freakbits.com/riaa-victims-1-...-to-54000-0123
considering that the 24 songs she was convicted of were in her over 1000 cds she owned.
And she basically used kazza as a format shifting method
(rather then hunting thru 1000s of cd she owned and personally ripping the songs to mp3s she just searched and found them pre ripped on kazza)
that one should have been thrown out completely.
|