Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
that paper is, what, 20 years old. since that time she's done zero re: anti-porn. the supreme court does not *go after* anything. they hear cases brought before them and render an opinion.
she's harmless re: the porn industry. i have no problem with her being nominated.
|
she might not do anything about it, but the fact that she thinks that way should give you cause for concern.
anyone in such a position who ever speaks of modifying the constitution to serve an agenda is pretty scary.
on edit- just to let you know, i am still fairly pro obama...with reservations. this is one of them.