Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
that paper is, what, 20 years old. since that time she's done zero re: anti-porn. the supreme court does not *go after* anything. they hear cases brought before them and render an opinion.
she's harmless re: the porn industry. i have no problem with her being nominated.
|
The Supreme Court doesn't "go after" anything but, they define everything.
Kagan has quite clearly telegraphed exactly how she'll vote re any obscenity cases that come before her.
The bible thumpers have good reason to rejoice today
