Quote:
Originally Posted by PenisFace
Sadly, our compassion for one another means that science has developed things that keep the weak and sick alive and ready to procreate. As you can imagine, this doesn't bode will for the health of the species. When medicine came to be, is when evolution began tracking backwards, as far as I'm concerned. If the weak and sick don't die, and even procreate, how is the human species not toast?
As far as I know, we are the only species that allows the weak and dying to continue to live and procreate, which would explain our ailments  |
I should have been dead at 17 and even as recently as 60 years ago I probably would have been.
Produces a similar situation to the bone-idle workshy parasites on state benefits for life who will breed and produce children that don't work who will breed and produce another set of children that don't work. They are a drain on society just paying for a basic lifestyle.
Now apart from the fact that i'm not bone-idle and workshy and have done shitty jobs purely because I don't believe it's right to be a sponger i'm still a drain on society for being on what I think is the 6th most expensive drug in the world and unless something cheaper comes along i'm on it forever.
If I have children there is a high chance they would need it too in an ever more expensive triangle that never would have needed paying for in the past as i'd have been dead before the children side of things even came along.
Pharmaceutical companies love this idea. None of them wants to actually eliminate things like AIDS or cancer - they all want to be selling the most effective treatment for diseases instead.
There was recently introduced a prenatal screening test for what i've got which to me would now mean I could have a defective baby aborted but there are far to many anti-abortion nuts who seem to think eugenics is a bad thing that would carry on and happily burden themselves and everyone around them by having a baby that is definitely going to be unhealthy
