View Single Post
Old 07-18-2010, 09:58 AM  
CDSmith
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
CDSmith's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am *I* located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :)
Posts: 51,460
So it's universally agreed then that gays are the only people with taste and a sense of style?

Interesting.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead View Post
"Brave New World" Aldous Huxley
Thanks. I see it was written in 1931, well before the concept of genetics was concieved. Still it's quite a work of sci-fi for it's time. I haven't read it but looked up and read the detailed plot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World and backstory. Sure enough, it comes as no surprise that it's been banned in the past in several countries.

Good suggest though. It's close to the subject matter at hand but doesn't quite hit the mark entirely of what I'm angling at here.



Does anyone think that such a removal or deactivation of the supposedly mythical "gay gene" could be a world-ending move in the long run? "World-enders" are typically thought of as some natural or randomly occuring disaster like a giant meteor hitting the Earth or our polar ice caps melting and drowning the world, etc. But could something that is developed in human science also end up being a world-ender event?

Were it true in this case it would mean gays, although not able to procreate, are vital to the continued long term survival and well-being of the human race. Ridiculous? Possible? Utter nonsense and downright scandalous?

Think on it carefully (if you can) before answering.
__________________
Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
ICQ me at: 31024634
CDSmith is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote