Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
Does anyone think that such a removal or deactivation of the supposedly mythical "gay gene" could be a world-ending move in the long run? "World-enders" are typically thought of as some natural or randomly occuring disaster like a giant meteor hitting the Earth or our polar ice caps melting and drowning the world, etc. But could something that is developed in human science also end up being a world-ender event?
Were it true in this case it would mean gays, although not able to procreate, are vital to the continued long term survival and well-being of the human race. Ridiculous? Possible? Utter nonsense and downright scandalous?
Think on it carefully (if you can) before answering.
|
Maybe in a small closed society they would add value for having the spare time not eaten up by children to care for others.
However, as the human race is so numerous and widespread i'm pretty sure you could randomly get rid of 90% of the worlds population tomorrow without that leading to extinction - unless you just shot the 90% and left them to rot in the street and spread disease which killed off the remaing 10%.