Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony
My constant in this thread.
"Shoot till attack is stopped". This is common training with LEO, Self Defense with handgun, and is a fact. You tell me I'm wrong and use your personal stories as proof. I cite you empirical data, and you tell me I'm wrong.
|
Umm... I never said you were wrong, I said this is how we train. What I said was very clear and doesn't need to be twisted. The purpose is to stop the attack or threat, we have both made that clear... what you're ignoring is it doesn't say to kill, it says to stop. That is, actually important.
It's the Police's duty is to use the least amount of force as possible... that's why it doesn't say kill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony
Your argument this whole thread.
1. You can shoot 1 round and stop someone --- Still waiting for proof
2. There's an ammo shortage -- And that matters why in a gun fight
3. Standard training is one shot one kill
4. You can do it, so every police officer or Law Enforcement Officer for that matter should do it.
|
1) Joke right? People die / get stopped from one shot all the time, good lord
use google. So one shot can be made, it can stop/kill a person, but it might not - which is the point.
2) It matters to other Cops that don't have ammo, that need it... why are we covering this again?
3) If I remember correctly, it's called: One shot, one kill vs. double tap shots. It was repeated in all training I had, other than double tap came in during SRT training. So yeah, rather standard.
4) I'm for sure not the only one that can shoot a gun, far better people trained me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony
You've been proven to be wrong. But yet you continue to argue. You bring up your mental breakdown to compare with the shoot out in this thread. Any sane person working with facts and not anecdotes can see that every situation is different. But you cling on desperately with your personal story hoping that it supersedes FBI and every firearms training doctrine I've ever trained with.
You just can't admit when you are wrong.
|
You haven't proven anything... you posted information and twisted it to match your view point, that's all you did.
They compare because the guy had a history of mental problems and it's the police's job to take in that situation, so it can be treated differently.
So my experience means nothing because your experience supersedes it? Love those twists, really I do.