Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyDanza
Deadly force, as defined by the United States Armed Forces, is the force in which a person uses, causing or that a person knows, or should know, would create a substantial risk of causing, death or serious bodily harm. The use of deadly force is justified only under conditions of extreme necessity as a last resort, when all lesser means have failed or cannot reasonably be employed.
Firearms, bladed weapons, explosives, and vehicles are among those weapons the use of which is considered deadly force. The use of non-weapons in an aggressive manner, such as a baseball bat or tire iron, may also be considered deadly force.
"Use of deadly force" is often granted to police forces when the person or persons in question are believed to be an immediate danger to people around them. For example, an armed man in a shopping mall shooting at random without regard to the safety of the people around him, and refusing or being unwilling to negotiate, would likely warrant usage of deadly force, as a means to prevent further danger to the community.
so I think we all agree that a man shooting in a mall at random would be just as "crazy" as charging a cop with a knife right?
|
Oh I don't think what they did was wrong or broke any laws or anything... I know they had the right to do what they did.
That other part between the bolds is pretty important though: The use of deadly force is justified only under conditions of extreme necessity as a last resort, when all lesser means have failed
Yes, reasonable too... could they have only shot him once, used a taser, pepper spray? Maybe so, then again I don't really have enough of the story to know how they approached him.