Quote:
Originally Posted by lazycash
"I dont know if I can say Dwreck owed the money again and if it will make you see that I agree with that point... but keep trying to think I didnt say that. "
I have no idea what you mean here.
"of course people can make unbiased judgements even if their friend is involved... Like i did."
You can't and you didn't, its impossible for you to be 100% objective in the matter when dwreck is a close friend. There's nothing wrong with being biased and backing up a friend, but don't accuse others of being biased when you clearly have been.
You keep wanting to bring up the chip incident and all of the other details, but they are pointless after dwreck agreed to pay back Carlos the remaining $150 he admitted he owed him. He missed his payment date and the details became public, nothing really left to say. I only mentioned the jtf incident because Carlos also didn't care about the amount as much as the principal of the matter.
|
you are wrong as you CAN be objective. I also feel youre wrong on the principle part. I feel Carlos made this thread like he did to tarnish Dwreck's name into giving the money back right away and thats the only reason I have said anything in this thread... its not just about the principle for Carlos... It IS about getting his money. If it was principle it wouldnt have gone down like this.
THats all my point is... im not arguing the actual principle.
Surely you can see that.