View Single Post
Old 07-23-2010, 09:18 AM  
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
Knee jerk reaction to any more regulations Barry wants, I don't trust it
But I have read in depth about the net law they want, they just want more regulations on high usage or so they say. Did you ever think how Youtube or Facebook has impacted our lives, do you think that they would have happened if net neutrality was in place? More regulation on the net is a bad thing, it will not help us, we have to adapt to the change in the net, not the other way around.
THeir are pros and cons to everything, I don't like this and I don't think what they propose is completely thought out as the internet is ever changing, how do you control what the free wifi hotspot give out in bandwidth?





I don't give a crap about Bush, the world was worse off after his presidency, Reagan ended the cold war, yet they gave Barry a fucking Nobel Peace Prize when he planned to send more troops to Afghanistan
Reagan ended the Iran crisis, now under Barry, Iran is building a nuke.
You can pick and choose the things that Reagan did as good or bad, but the economy was better off after he was done, People had jobs. And nobody threatened us.
Right now, the local state governments are laying off cops and firemen and the Barry in charge is increasing the size of the government, increasing the size of regulations putting a strangle hold on small business , I live in California, I've seen what more regulations do to business in this state, they move to Nevada.
funny you didnt have shit to say when bush was president.hmmm
You have no idea what net neutrality is and its not more regulations. lol he is protecting your cracker ass.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote