View Single Post
Old 07-28-2010, 04:12 AM  
spazlabz
Confirmed User
 
spazlabz's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 6,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by stocktrader23 View Post
As it should. The law is written in that way so that a business is not held responsible for their users breaking the law. It makes perfect sense in that regard and if you really think about it there's not much more they could do about it without limiting your freedom to own a site that people can upload shit to.
You make a very valid point here. I would add one stipulation though and that would be that since users are submitting the content, they should be considered primary producers and subject to the same laws as anyone else. So when they submit content to tube sites etc they should be expected to have a 2257 statement that is compliant with US law.........let's see how many users would upload videos then

Since tubes sites profit from these user submitted videos they should be required by law to verify that each user has a valid 2257 notification...yes this might be inconvenient, but I find it inconvenient as hell to find a full length video of ours that some user has uploaded to a tube site without a license
spazlabz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote