Quote:
Originally Posted by Choker
This change is not due to economics but rather the recent court ruling dismissing the FSC lawsuit. In order to be fully 2257 compliant I would need ids of every model in every thumb that sends to a gallery and it's simply not worth the hassle. Chokertraffic is fine financially, in fact I have pushed many legal tube sites into Alexa top 1000 recently and I continue to change my business model to accomadate the market. I recently introduced popunders to my system, anyone wanting to buy or sell them hit me up. For the last year I have been able to supply all traffic buyers with my own traffic, but demand is up so I am now accepting new resellers. My dating program is making record profits and I have decided to expand it and make more cobrands for serious webmasters.
Anyone going to Miami hit me up no matter what your business is (except hosting, lol) lets do some business.
|
If its just the 2257 thing, why would ANY trafficbroker still send traffic through? Im not seeing any of the other brokers closing up part of their shop. Economy is brutal, are you sure its not just that? Its ok to admit bro, as long as you payout your existing clients.
Arent you afraid that they will go after fake profile pictures on datingsites? I mean, if you close part of chokertraffic, i think its even more risky to keep up dating sites promoting fake profiles. Like for example:
www.realfreedate.com ?
Btw. awesome how you pushed all these tubes to the top1000 recently, can you show us some? Just 4-5 or something?
I may have a few clients for you that want to buy massive amounts of hq traffic, but is it possible to NOT receive traffic from that searchengine you own (
http://www.chokinchicking.com) or the circlejerk sites (
http://www.hooga.com/)?