Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
That's what I thought too when they did it.
But now I'm open to the thought that maybe, just maybe...the scientists and guys who actually work in the oil business might know a little more about how that stuff works than I do.
Just sayin' I'm open to the idea. Not saying that I am going to give the top people in their fields ANY consideration over my own GFY smarts or the findings of GFY scientists.
It has been proven over and over again that we here on GFY are stupi...er, I mean SMARTER than any so-called "scientists" or people with actual experience in a field.
 |
If you look at the behavior of BP as an indicator, then my guess is the only reason they used the dispersant was to hide the oil till after they settled everything in court. If it actually made the situation better, then it was totally by dumb luck.
They have been asking local scientists to sign agreements in which they get paid a six figure salary but they cannot testify against BP in any court for over a year. My guess is the internal BP experts know the problems will start to surface in about a year and they want to have everything settled in court before then.
But maybe BP really cared about people and the environment when they went against every other scientist at the EPA and local universities and sprayed those dispersants 24/7. Anything is possible I guess.