Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head
He didn't "ignore" federal law. He ruled on it's validity. There's a difference. What you're suggesting is that the judge should have taken a look at Prop 8 and said, "Well, it's federal law so, it stands!" How old are you?
|
Prop8 couldnt even have been on the ballot if federal law had no allowed it, unfortunately for advocates of same-sex marriage federal law ALREADY ruled that LEGAL marriage is defined as a union between a male and a female. So let me get this straight, our federal representative created a law that federally in essence banned same-sex marriage, then voters in California banned same-sex marriage and then ONE HOMOSEXUAL judge decides he doesnt like that so he tries to pick it apart with an opinion and suddenly you all think the Supreme Court will overturn the will of the federal government and majority of people?
