View Single Post
Old 08-06-2010, 01:41 PM  
mardigras
Bon temps!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: down yonder
Posts: 14,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by cambaby View Post
Prop8 couldnt even have been on the ballot if federal law had no allowed it, unfortunately for advocates of same-sex marriage federal law ALREADY ruled that LEGAL marriage is defined as a union between a male and a female. So let me get this straight, our federal representative created a law that federally in essence banned same-sex marriage, then voters in California banned same-sex marriage and then ONE HOMOSEXUAL judge decides he doesnt like that so he tries to pick it apart with an opinion and suddenly you all think the Supreme Court will overturn the will of the federal government and majority of people?
When I was a kid (I'm 48) the "will of the people" in my state was to slap "Whites Only" signs on drinking fountains, restrooms, restaurants, etc... it was not a vote of the people that ended it. The Supreme Court ended school segregation in October '69, against "the will of the people". Were those "activist" judges? Were they wrong?
__________________
.
mardigras is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote