Quote:
Originally Posted by RDFrame
Nope, no problems with it. The US is just behind the times right now, thanks to the rednecks. If you look at history though, gay marriage will be fully accepted throughout the US shortly. Give it a decade or so, and someone looking down on a gay couple will be the same as them looking down on a black person nowadays. Totally shunned.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
I'm in favor of not being able to "be in favor" of anything that has to do with people's personal lives.
It's none of my business, none of your business, and damn sure none of the government's business.
Don't they have better things to be doing?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom
"supporters of gay rights"
Would people be more animated about it if it said:
"supporters of womens rights" ?
how about
"supporters of rights" ?
It's about simple human rights, for individual citizens. The article also stubs it's toe talking about gay couples wanting to be entitled to the same rights as heterosexual couples. This is fundamentally flawed speech since people dont attain rights by marriage. They attain them by being born. They want to have nothing but the SAME rights as anyone else. Period. Makes it pretty gd simple doesn't it?
|
I believe that if gay people want to give half their shit away to someone they hate, they should have that right just as breeders do.