|
Once again the industry forgets what is the most important, and that is the consumer, who doesn't care either way how you built your site so long as it works.
Neither tables, css or a combo of the two will make the consumer cum any harder than if you didn't have them. They won't make him rebill any longer. They will not be the deciding factor on if he joins your site or not.
Build with whatever tools you need to build with to get the job done. Validate it, make sure it's cross browser friendly, and don't get your panties in a bunch over which tool is better. You should be worrying about how increase your sales and rebills. If you feel css only can provide better SEO, go for it. I see many top listings built with tables inside of tables inside of tables. Some of the biggest money making sites online are built with tables. So who's right? Doesn't matter. You're selling PORN, not an invisible code that only "webmasters" argue over. "Pornographers" know better.
This is such a nerdy conversation that is as useful as arguing what color makes the best background color. Telling someone else they are retarded or lazy for using another tool shows just how out of touch with the adult industry some of you are.
What's "best" is up to you. How can you get your product to the market place the quickest? What method will allow the most people to view it? Will learning a new method actually bring in more money? Only you can answer that.
I use a combination of both and have not made the full jump to css because of the cross browser quirks that end up being a huge time waster for me to trouble shoot. If someone can get that worked out, css is my choice. But in the meantime, I have to work with what gets the job done the quickest and is the most stable across browsers.
But that is just my 2 cents after 14 years in the industry.
|