Quote:
Originally Posted by UFGators2007
Are we talking about the look of authenticity? I would also like to see examples of good vs bad content
|
That would be good.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ottopottomouse
only thing that seems bad about some of it is the lighting is too good.
|
Because the real thing would never be shot in a well lit location.
The myth is that all that all exgf content has to be shot by morons who can't put a camera on auto exposure/focus. LOL
The whole thing about exgf (can it be current GF being naughty?
) content is the performance of the girl or/and guy. Yes with todays models it's tough getting them to do anything for real. They seem to keep real for free and fake for paid.
Can it be shot sometimes on a decent camera, in a well lit room and by someone with enough brains to know how to use a camera? Or does it always have to be shot by a moron on his/her phone? We have a little amateur camera that shoots stills and videos. The problem is it's probably to good exgf. Cost about $400 years ago.
If you're willing to pay the price and give enough work people will come up with the goods. And I believe this is the problem. The cost of shooting it and the ROI does not warrant putting too much effort into it. Yes the shooter has to break out of his style to shoot it, but that's a short learning curve. Dumbing down takes less skill than improving on style.