Bill8

C'mon man, all that is commentary, not specific cases.

the first one refers to the stolen east anglia emails - and close to ten independent investigations have all concluded no fraud.

the second doesn't even mention a specific case in the first 6 to 8 paragraphs, it was all editorial and innuendo, so I stopped reading.

websites called climate change fraud and global warming skeptics are useless by definition - they are not legitimate sources.

what I need is specific cases, reported in both legitimate national media AND the science literature, so we can examine real examples.

the east anglia emails have ALREADY been investigated and declared nonfraudulent (altho they did raise this issue of sharing unpublished results), so it's borderline fraud on your part to put up the stolen private east anglia emails as an example.

I understand your denial websites and commentators are telling you to keep repeating fraud, but unless you can show fraud, IT IS FRAUD TO KEEP CLAIMING FRAUD.

I'm not saying there may not be any fraud - scientists are very competitive and science fraud occurs, such as the recent case of the evo psych guy and his monkey tests.

But you are making a claim that I am saying you cannot support.

Put up specific cases, and lets look at the evidence.