Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
In California its already been legally determined that performers are employees. There is case law on it. So that argument is going to fail.
The best argument against condoms would be a challenge on a First Amendment basis but no one seems to want to take on that fight.
|
I hope the First Amendment basis/argument surfaces if Cal/OSHA and AHF don't back off; adult film productions result in expressive speech, thus strict scrutiny; testing is reasonable "equivalency", thus Cal/OSHA's regulations/enforcement is not the least restrictive means; etc, etc.
The effects of Cal/OSHA, piracy, 2257, and .xxx make the future of porn look iffy.
I hope PornLaw can get his opinion voiced and supported by everyone.