Quote:
Originally Posted by daizzzy
Fethard owner about epass
some good suggestions
|
I use google translate:
Wash, if someone interested in my opinion, everything is pretty obvious.
At least the basis for jokes aside feta exactly is.
1. I am almost sure that it still is a big hole in the finances. All too similar.
Because it is am feeling that the situation known in advance, to the point, I will say it again and do not exclude that even for this movie actually took off (to reduce the effect of impact on reputation). In my view Epass should be at least 10 times more of the same Feta - ie Balances are hundreds of millions of dollars as a minimum. TE the same film to stir up quite a real vesh.
Now, for the sake of compare with the situation on Fet. For the first few weeks as I remember we (or rather I) nothing really intelligible not said and done stupid things. And this is perfectly normal situation for any company in which something has happened which nobody expected. There is no such. Here, quite obviously what happened was expected, but the reverse is clearly depicted. Do not know if they express their concerns in advance, they would have two weeks in advance at all if only for technical errors and holidays and leave of employees referred to.
2. On the other hand, I almost (not 100% but still) convinced that the attack is not fatal. Otherwise, it would be entirely different legend.
The simplest - Epass be six months before all of this would be sold to any thread-fund investment or the company who would all crap, and took all the blame on himself (for example - that is how it was done with iBill, properly so always done, no one in the head is not finds that the fund that bought before the fall of the same trite iBill by his bosses and could belong to).
3. Everything is of course, but I honestly doubt that Epass could somehow get dull, such as built up on the grandmother webmasters floor Los Angeles, and then dick fucking behold crisis and not for sale. I suspect that they probably bought sknanb.com, in terms of their business (Peykom mud in the same process) and turns it all perfectly logical business decision, but the bank turned out to be somewhere drawn from vylezesh not lossless, so this may well be , because the bank has always terrotorialno may be too much tied. Local Cobra failed 100M to build a hacienda, but he was the second main Cobra on the island for example.
4. Now I think a couple of weeks will be strenuously to fuck the brain (the documents for the warp, etc.) to reset the volume skillfully withdrawal, it will work one hundred percent, the banks always do and it works. As the crisis Alfabank put on ATMs rate of 10% for obnal and not fuck, and everything.
Listen
Read phonetically
E-Passporte. Tips suffering.
Record of RedEye posted Today 7:56
I read the forums - pipets as people certainly hurt the situation with Epassom.
The point of view I unsubscribe are here:
http://crutop.nu/Vbulletin/showpost....&postcount=397
Generally between the Fet and Epassom have a noticeable difference:
1. Epasse in the majority of clients are decorated for themselves and their data.
2. Cards Epassa decorated with real instruments and name.
Accordingly, this situation applies standard rules and laws related to banking activities, they are international and completely the same as a rule from Moscow, and to Papua New Guinea.
What is not so bad because it means:
1. Site is the property of the Bank. In this case SNKANB.com
Almost does not matter in terms of oversight is a chart board master account or not - at least he is in one form or another client of the bank because the official is a card holder sobtsvennosti Bank.
2. No bank has the right not to perform or prepyatsvovat execution of payment order without consideration of reasons, etc. etc.. According to the law. For failure to perform assignments without proper reasons as shown on a second banking license.
3. In case of not executing the order must at least receive an official razyasnenie from the bank and notify the supervisory authority, the supervisory body for banks is the Central Bank.
CB legally obliged to verify the statements of citizens.
What does this mean in practice? This method was invented not by me, and sometimes used when obnalschiki each other understand.
What do the following:
1. Find a local lawyer at SantKittse. Do not think that they are all best friends of the bank. Some are friends and nahuy send others will be their old enemies and be happy to help (not free clear stump - a 5-10K green it may well do).
Variants with Guugla:
http://www.hg.org/law-firms/Banking-Law/St_-Kitts.html
If not go to lawyers St.Kittsa lawyers just take out the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank have a common to several island countries and by the way is just to Art. Kitts.
2. Signed a contract with the lawyer. Can collectively.
3. Lawyer prepares two letters (or one with a copy to another address), one in the bank St.Kittsa, another in the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern...n_Central_Bank
The meaning of the letter is as follows:
"Hello pot. I Zovuni John Hui Cobra lawyer from the village of such and such. I represent the interests of these stupid ass with Krutopa and less important forums (it can be omitted).
My client (my clients) are the holders of cards of your ebuchego Bank and for some dick that knows reason can not get your Salvage, which is certainly a violation of local law Cobra from such a date, the number so and so (the guilty - to devour).
Please, in the prescribed manner and on schedule to inform me of a dick I do not give my Salvage and with whom and where to ask.
A copy of the letter directed to:
-CB Vostnochnogo Caribbean
Jur. Address Epassa (Curaçao nimnogo or little)
Chris Mallick personally.
Next by law the bank must respond to your lawyer that actually happens. Nahuy he does not send exactly especially given the copy of the letter to the local Central Bank which is exactly the same way the law will be obliged to immediately conduct an audit who is actually who and where to throw.
With the probability of 99% of those who do the Salvage try to return as quickly as possible, but you unsubscribe, I do not I, dick knows, on Monday with a maximum on Friday. "
Because it is every letter of the law of official institutions (and the Central Bank and Bank of these are) should be the answer in a timely manner (certainly not more than a month). The very answer, as the bankers and Chris Mallick, and the local Central Bank knows a reason for the next letter and simultaneously attract the press - Brian fucking see what I sent to Cobra garbage - oh, you ebty schA and violent story.