Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
They definitely have. And they did it via copyright infringement...it was the company Titan.
But don't lump me with "you guys" when you talk about protecting my content. I've been actively protecting my stuff for over 2 years while "experts" like Shap told me right here on GFY that I was going to make my members angry at me for treating them like "criminals" just because I protect my content.
Well, time has proven me right as we are having a record breaking September in both new sales and rebills, while I'm watching lots of other companies go down.
And here is an article on the Titan lawsuit: http://business.avn.com/articles/Tit...tor-54226.html |
i love how you ignore the actual court rulings and go to the "pending" court cases as proof
http://techcrunch.com/2008/08/28/wha...be-and-others/
titan lost their case again veoh
they made the same arguement about making money they were doing in the referenced case because veoh charged membership fees
Quote:
If you will notice...2257 IS mentioned in the suit. But not because a tube has to have it (it doesn't, again: user uploaded), but because it creates unfair business practices because Titan DOES have to have 2257 and can't compete against a site that is not only stealing, but also isn't restrained by 2257 record keeping.
This is how things are going to work. Using what WAS a pirate's "strength" against them and turning it into their biggest weaknesses. It took a while to figure out the correct attack angle, but now? It's on.
|
i predicted that the fair use was an unfair business practice was going to lose when teen revenue made that arguement,
i was right they lost
prediction they will lose this arguement as well.
free speach (this is my favorite porn scene commentary) being an unfair business practice is going to be even more unlikely to win.