Originally Posted by Kingfish

The standard of proof in a civil case is something more likely than not. The only way the guy could defend this would be to hire an expert witness to attack the technology. So basically he is looking at a minimum of 10k in addition to his attorney?s fees to be able to discredit the technology. And what?s in it for the defendant to fight the case? Even if he wins he is still out all his legal fees and the public including his employer, pastor, wife, kids and neighbors knows what kind of porn he looks at. Why not just pay the $150 and make it all go away? I think most people would be willing to cough up a couple of thousand just to make it all go away.