Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Yeah, that's the point... get people insurance that can't otherwise have it. So roughly 45 million people without insurance and something like 60 million people yearly with gaps in insurance, making premiums go up, etc - is a small percentage?
Nothing in the bill will force my company out of any healthcare it has and if more people are paying in, the costs would go down, not up. Like it does in every Country in the world that does this.
Taxed? It's the same way as now.
So I'm trading slave owners is what you're saying? Because without question the current insurance/health setup is Slavery that I have to pay for as well.
|
I've never found that my government-mandated car insurance is there when I've needed it.
I don't have health insurance and I find healthcare -- even including major events -- is less expensive than putting some insurance middleman in the middle. Add a middleman and raise the price of the product. It is basic business math.
I would have favored genuine universal healthcare, but it is not okay to have the government forcing me to buy more obnoxious and undependable insurance I will have to fight with when I am least able.